Eff. Dee. Ae.

Celebrities may not read their reviews, but at Lifebox, we do.   Avidly.

(Don’t you bet the celebrities do too?)

We want to know what delegates found most useful – or not – about our workshops.

Mozambique_questions from the audience

Lifebox training in Mozambique

We want to know how colleagues are doing this week with the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist at our pilot site in Rwanda.

Kibagabaga Checklists And we want to know, in the face of the devastating surgical safety crisis, that we have the right tools to support our colleagues on the frontline.

Ghana_provider with oximeter

So we read the studies.  We ask the questions.  And we respond.

That way we can say with confidence that we know the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist reduces complication and mortality in the operating room by more than 30%.

We know pulse oximeters keep patients safer during surgery.

And we know the model we distribute is the right one for long-term, optimized use in low-resource setting countries.

We have the study to prove it.

Accuracy of the Lifebox pulse oximeter during hypoxia in healthy volunteers,” published last month in the medical journal Anaesthesia, confirms that the Lifebox model meets USA Food and Drug Administration (FDA) standards for accuracy.

We’ve always said that low-resource doesn’t mean low quality.  Apart from being insulting, it’s also a particularly impractical M.O.   (So you’re the inventor of the papier-mâché umbrella for monsoon season.  What a bargain.  You must be very proud.)

Our equipment is used to save lives; it was always going to be high-quality. And it wasn’t picked off the shelf – it was specially designed for use in a low-resource setting, after consultation with those who know that reality best.

Nicaragua_patient monitoring post-surgery

But now you don’t need to take our word (or their words) for it – Dubowitz et al declare it so!

Researchers at University of California San Francisco (USCF) and Duke University Medical Center (DUMC) compared the Lifebox oximeter against arterial haemoglobin oxygen saturation more than 1400 times, on 57 healthy adults.  In laboratory setting they found that it compared as well as higher cost commercial units currently available in the US, and recommended it as an inexpensive solution for patient monitoring without compromising standards.

Oximeter distribution

Now, some big news – which we’ll announce in grand fashion shortly, but it’s too exciting not to share with our best readers – is that Lifebox has just passed the 6000 mark for pulse oximeters and training distributed.

Of course there’s still a long way to go.

But with a review like this one in Anaesthesia?

We’re grateful to our colleagues who took the time to put such a robust study together, thankful for the 57 volunteers who made that study possible, honoured to work with our frontline colleagues and – without honking our own trumpet (too loudly) – thrilled to say we’re moving in the right direction!

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s